Formula 1
Montoya: Mercedes ruined Russell's Monza race by not double-stacking
Core answer: Juan Pablo Montoya cho rằng Mercedes đã làm tổn hại cơ hội thắng GP Italy của George Russell khi không cho Russell pit và double-stack cùng Kimi Antonelli trong pha VSC. Antonelli từ P19 thắng; Russell về nhì. Key facts: - Mercedes giành 1-2 tại Monza với chiến thắng của Andrea Kimi Antonelli. - Antonelli là tay đua Ý đầu tiên vô địch tại Monza kể từ 1966. - Russell đang dẫn đầu khi VSC xuất hiện nhưng không được pit. - Montoya: Russell nên được ưu tiên pit, Mercedes nên double-stack. - Toto Wolff: Russell dùng lốp cứng, buộc phải một lần dừng, không còn phương án. Nguồn: F1 TV post-race show và Sky Sports F1, tổng hợp từ bài viết người dùng cung cấp. Related Q&A: - Q: Vì sao Mercedes không pit cho Russell? A: Toto Wolff nói Russell dùng lốp cứng và đội cần phương án một lần dừng nên không có lựa chọn nào khác. - Q: Montoya có tin Antonelli vẫn thắng nếu double-stack? A: Ông không loại trừ khả năng Antonelli thắng, nhưng cho rằng cuộc đua sẽ sít sao và hấp dẫn hơn." } ```
The virtual safety car phase at Monza became the biggest tactical flashpoint after Andrea Kimi Antonelli beat George Russell to win the Italian Grand Prix. Mercedes celebrated a 1-2 finish, but former Formula 1 driver Juan Pablo Montoya strongly criticised the decision not to pit Russell under VSC.
Antonelli, starting from 19th, became the first Italian race winner at Monza since 2026. Russell led the early part of the race and looked like the main victory contender before the VSC changed everything. While Antonelli was called into the pits, Russell was left out. Antonelli then used fresher tyres to catch and pass Russell.
Montoya said on F1 TV's post-race show: “Russell was leading and he should have had priority on the pitstop. When that virtual safety car came, it's quicker to stop than staying out. They should have stopped him, they should have double-stacked him, and he should have stopped ahead of Antonelli.”
He added that Antonelli might still have won, but Mercedes should have allowed a closer fight. Toto Wolff defended the team, saying Russell was on hard tyres and needed to follow a one-stop strategy. Wolff also said nothing could have stopped Antonelli on the day and that Russell was fighting with worn tyres at the end.
The debate will continue because the VSC window created a clear opportunity to protect the leading car. By choosing to pit only Antonelli, Mercedes left Russell exposed and forced him to defend with older tyres against a teammate on a faster strategy.

Cầu thủ liên quan
Bài đề xuất
Sainz, Turn 7 and the Madring Penalty: A New Circuit Offers No Data to Plead Your Case2026-09-13
No Data, No Verdict: Lessons from an Empty F1 Analysis2026-09-09
19 Red Flags at the Madring: The Data Verdict on Red Bull Before the 2026 Season Even Starts2026-09-11
F1's aerodynamic sliding scale: backmarkers get 115% of testing time, but opportunity does not convert itself into points2026-09-14
Empty Data Cells and the F1 Lesson on Judgment Without Evidence2026-09-14
Madring 2026: The 'Car Killer' Circuit and the Reality Check Red Bull Cannot Escape2026-09-11
Montoya: Mercedes ruined Russell's Monza race by not double-stacking2026-09-08
Bài đề xuất
When an F1 Analysis Is All N/A: The Line Between Insight and Illusion2026-09-08
F1 2026: Seats Are Decided by Power Unit Contracts, Not by Form2026-09-15
Carlos Sainz - Ambassador of the Madrid Grand Prix: Emotions from Home2026-09-09
Monza 2026: Antonelli's P19 Victory and the Questions the Data Sheet Can't Answer2026-09-08
Empty Data Cells and the F1 Lesson on Judgment Without Evidence2026-09-14
F1 Transfer Market: Contract Structure and the 2026 Regulation Marker Shape the Driver Map2026-09-13
A data-less F1 analysis: When “insufficient information” is also a signal2026-09-09
Bài đề xuất
When F1 Analysis Is 'N/A': The Data Void Exposes the Chronic Ailment of Sports Journalism2026-09-10
F1 Tactical Analysis: No Technical Information Available to Assess Car Upgrades2026-09-09
Montoya: Mercedes ruined Russell's Monza race by not double-stacking2026-09-08
Madring 2026: New Circuit, Old Rules — The Faster Learner Wins2026-09-13
Robin Raikkonen joins the Red Bull academy: A legend's quiet note or a future contract?2026-09-09
McLaren did not intervene at Monza: MCL40 is slow on straights, but the philosophy of letting drivers decide made up for the qualifying gap2026-09-08
Empty Data Cells and the F1 Lesson on Judgment Without Evidence2026-09-14
Bài đề xuất
F1 Transfer Market: Contract Structure and the 2026 Regulation Marker Shape the Driver Map2026-09-13
Madring 2026: The 'Car Killer' Circuit and the Reality Check Red Bull Cannot Escape2026-09-11
Madring 2026: New Circuit, Old Rules — The Faster Learner Wins2026-09-13
F1's aerodynamic sliding scale: backmarkers get 115% of testing time, but opportunity does not convert itself into points2026-09-14
Empty Data Cells and the F1 Lesson on Judgment Without Evidence2026-09-14
Monza 2026: Antonelli's P19 Victory and the Questions the Data Sheet Can't Answer2026-09-08
When F1 Analysis Is 'N/A': The Data Void Exposes the Chronic Ailment of Sports Journalism2026-09-10
